Problems we help clients with.
When the vision or strategy is clear, but the commitment is not
Has the strategic direction been clear to you for some time, while stakeholder concerns keep delaying the commitment to act on it?
Are board papers being revised to satisfy criteria that have not been openly agreed?
Are debates that should be settled by evidence being settled by negotiation?
When the priorities don't add up to a strategy
Are several initiatives in flight, each with its own logic and its own sponsors, with no clear answer to which problem is core?
Has the work of choosing what to commit resources to first been deferred while the work continues?
Are resources spread thin across competing priorities, with progress on none of them?
When execution started with focus, but pulled away from the original intent
Has operational pressure quietly redirected the program away from the ambition that started it?
Is the leadership team unsure whether you are adapting tactics or quietly changing strategy?
Is the cost of not recommitting, or not recalibrating, accumulating in the background?

Examples of how we have helped clients achieve their goals.
How we are different
Polaris is a decision architecture firm. Most strategy consulting helps organisations execute on problems they have already defined; decision architecture starts earlier, discovering which problem is actually worth solving before resources are committed to it. The discipline is rigorous, but the conviction underneath it is simple: visions worth pursuing deserve the diagnostic work that lets them be pursued with greater confidence.
The work is anchored in research that should change how leaders think about strategic decisions. Tracking consequential organisational decisions over two decades, the research found that outcomes were no better than a coin toss - and that the most common way of setting direction, imposing a ready-made solution at the outset, had the worst record of any approach. Organisations that beat those odds are not smarter or better resourced. They are more disciplined about the question they ask before resources are committed. In fact, the quality of the decision process mattered six times more than the quantity and detail of the analysis (Lovallo & Sibony, 2010).
That is what we do. Every strategic decision Polaris has supported clients in taking to their board has been agreed without deferral - because the analytical groundwork answered whether the right problem is being solved, not just whether the chosen strategy could be executed. And our advice is based on hard facts, including primary research, which has reached more than 3,500 Australians across engagements. This facts-led approach has challenged our clients' assumptions as often as it has confirmed them.
In a world full of same-same advice and access to too much information, this is the difference.



